Saturday, April 10, 2010

What I use my iPad for

It's been a week since Apple released their latest revolution: the iPad. By now every major site has reviewed it (most positive), but unsure what the device is meant for. I got my iPad on the launch date, so have had a week to play around with it and show it off.

In the past week the number one question from everyone has been: what do you use your iPad for? As with any new device type, the most common use-cases are not immediately clear. I don't think Apple ever thought the appstore would be the greatest attractor of new users to the iPhone. The iPad is no different: it's a completely new beast and it'll take some time for people to figure out what to do with it.

In the past week, I've used my iPad primarily for these three things:


  • Games

  • Surfing

  • Email


In addition I've actually also spent quite some time showing the iPad off to various people. But that is of course a use-case that will be less relevant over time. Until that happens though, I'd advice every iPad owner to buy the apps in the iWorks suite. They show off the serious side of the iPad best for the moment.

Games


Not surprisingly the iPad makes a great device for games. For me it has been mostly casual games so far, but I might try out some more serious games (red alert, need for speed) soon.


My favorite games so far have been Harbor Master, Rush Hour and Labyrinth. All three seem to have been made exactly for this type of device, but with Rush Hour the playing pieces feel a bit too big. Maybe they're ahead of the pack and already made their game for the smaller iPad that is rumored to come next year.

Surfing


The iPad comes with Apple's latest Safari release, which is perfect for surfing the web. It doesn't allow tabbed browsing, which I think is a miss. But you can keep multiple pages open and switching between them is relatively elegant. When you shut down/restart Safari the pages take a bit of time to reload, which I think should not be needed on a device with 16GB or more of memory.


The iPad will not soon replace your laptop as your main device for surfing. Although it is totally usable, it is just not made for using at your desk. Maybe that changes when I get a docking station later this month, but for the moment the laptop wins the battle for my desk.

Where the iPad really shines is on the couch. I had some discussion with friend who'd say they use their laptop on the couch too. Maybe they do, but it's not the same thing. Whether I'm talking to visiting friends or are watching TV, the iPad is always within immediate reach. You can just leave it turned on all the time, it turns off the screen automatically and never gets hot nor does it ever make any noise. A laptop would simply not fit comfortably in the same seat as me or be waiting on the armrest of my chair just in case I need to look something up. Hmm... I think I've seen that actor before, let's look on IMDB quickly - no need to wait for a commercial break.

Email


My number three usage has been reading and responding to email. The on-screen keyboard is quite good, especially in landscape mode. Although as Apple claimed the keys are almost full-size, it does take some time to adapt to them. Without tactile feedback it is very easy to touch a few keys without noticing. So what I see most people do very quickly is arch their fingers a bit more to avoid those accidental key presses.


Reading and writing email works like a charm. Switching between multiple mailboxes takes a bit of tapping, but nothing too bad. The iPad really came to my rescue this week when my laptop started acting up. Instead of having to fall back to my iPhone or having to steal somebody else laptop, I could switch to the iPad and write reasonably lengthy responses.

So those are my top 3 use cases of the past week: gaming, surfing and mailing. There were also some things that I didn't use my iPad for, even though there is great software available and people had predicted those use-cases.

Not for reading


Apple tries to position the iPad as the ultimate eBook reader. I was already skeptical about this before I got my iPad, simply because I've grown to love my Sony Reader over the past half year. The one thing I love about the Sony is the eInk screen.


Although the iPad's screen is gorgeous, for readability it doesn't compare to eInk. Try reading intensely for more than a few minutes and you'll notice the difference. The iPad might look fresher and cleaner, but reading an eInk screen is simply less stressful for the eyes than reading on the iPad.

Another thing holding the iPad back as an eBook reader is it's size and weight. I often read my Sony in bed, lying on my back holding it above me. I challenge anyone to do that with the iPad for more than a few minutes. It's simply too heavy and too clunky.

That said: the iBook software on the iPad looks great. Apple was kind enough to include an illustrated book of Winnie the Pooh, which perfectly shows the type of material the iPad was made for: colorful books with large fonts and pictures. I can easily see how the iPad might be a kids favorite reading device, even though I will stick to my Sony Reader for lengthy reading sessions.

Where the iPad had proven useful is for reading articles. Whenever I want to read an article from a website, I've always had to convert it for reading on my Sony Reader. Although it's not a huge amount of work, I love using Instapaper for the iPad. With a single click on my laptop, I transfer any article from the web over to Instapaper on the iPad - where it is automatically reformatted into easy reading format. I really wish a similar program/feature existed for my Sony Reader though, because I do miss the eInk screen when reading on my iPad.

Not for video


I've also not been watching much video on my iPad. I think I should say "not yet" here, because there seems to be no reason not to use the iPad for watching youtube or video's bought from iTunes.

Since the iPad doesn't support flash, many video sites may not work. But hopefully this is just a temporary nuisance until all sites do what youtube did: re-encode their video's to work in H.264 or whatever the format is.

When I did watch video, it looked great on the screen. At time the wireless network at some places couldn't keep up with the video, which is an unfortunate consequence of the HD resolution that the iPad supports.

7 comments:

Quintesse said...

Well actually the iPad only has 512MB of fast internal memory, the other 16+GB is relatively slow storage.

Quintesse said...

And my experience with e-Readers is the opposite: I really don't like those grey ish colors, they seem to lack contrast compared to real books. But they are light, that is true, but I still wouldn't use it for reading it on my back in bed because it's not the book that is heavy, but my arms, they get tired after 10 minutes and I have to change position anyway.
My iPhone on the other hand I use for reading all of the time, on the train, subway and bus. I just love it even though the screen is really small. And if I'm not reading a book I'm watching episodes of Lost or reading mail or articles.
People complaning about the weight are probably mostly English and Americans, where pocket books are the norm, but if you go to Holand or Spain most books are huge and heavy! I hate to take them with me because they are hard to manage.
So for me a thing like the iPad is soemthing I've been waiting for since many years.

Frank said...

In this case I was expecting Safari to persist the open pages to Flash storage, not to RAM. From the performance I see in rebuilding the snapshots the pages are not stored anywhere and are redownloaded.

I've only read reports about 256MB of RAM in the iPad (http://justanotheripadblog.com/ipad-basics/the-ipad-has-256mb-of-ram). Where did you find about it being 512MB?

Quintesse said...

Oops, when my memory said "256" I overrided it with common-sense and wrote "512"... of course my common sense was wrong, it's Apple after all hehehe

Gert said...

This very much confirms my ideas on how the iPad will be used.
Still not sure If I will buy one or not, although that now mostly has to do with the limited wifi coverage here in holland. and i'm not going to get another 3g account (already have two)
One remark about the video, it's the lack of .flv support that would require most flash based video sites to reencode their video's

EMacSki said...

Yeah, it runs any javascript very slow also. Running an image slider or in my case puf's particle system. VEEEERY SLOW. Much like the iPhone. Needs more processor power to do the cool interactive stuff us developers love!

I say wait, its still first gen.

Anonymous said...

I love how the Apple answer to Flash not being supported is that every Flash website in the world should change. What nonsense!